ACCF HOME PAGE - AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION
CONTACT US | SITE MAP
ABOUT ACCF | ACCF CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH | NEWS | NEWSLETTER | PROGRAMS | PUBLICATIONS

 

Click here to receive our newsletter via email.

Forward this page to a friend. Click here.

 

 

ACCF Capital Formation Newsletter

Capital Formation Newsletter
July-August 1997, Vol. 22, No. 5



American Council for Capital Formation: Significant Pro-Capital FormationTax Cuts Signed Into Law

ACCF Center for Policy Research: Center Forum Assesses Impact of U.S. Tax Code on Competitiveness of Financial Service Firms


ACCF Center for Policy Research Director: Norman B. Ture


Save the Date: September Forums Planned on International Trade and Climate Change Policy



Significant Pro-Capital Formation Tax Cuts Signed Into Law


On July 31, the House of Representatives, by a vote of 389 to 43, and the Senate, by a vote of 92 to 8, passed the first major tax reductions on saving and investment since 1981 as a part of "The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997." On August 5, President Clinton signed the measure into law.

The American Council for Capital Formation, which has fought for over two decades to see important pro-growth tax measures such as these enacted into law, congratulates especially House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Archer and Senate Finance Committee Chairman William V. Roth. The effective leadership of the chairmen of the two tax-writing committees of Congress ensured that the 1997 tax bill contained strong pro-saving and -investment provisions, including substantial cuts in capital gains taxes for individuals, a liberalization of individual retirement accounts, and much-needed easing of the corporate alternative minimum tax.

Key pro-capital formation provisions of the 1997 tax act are summarized below.
  • Capital Gains Tax Cuts for Individuals

    The maximum capital gains tax rate for individuals is reduced to 20 percent for gains on assets held (1) for 18 months or (2) for 12 months if sold after May 6, 1997 and before July 29, 1997. A 10 percent rate applies to individuals in the 15 percent bracket for the same time periods.

    Gains on assets sold on or after July 29, 1997, and held less than 12 months are taxed at the same rate as ordinary income (as high as 39.6 percent). Gains on assets sold on or after July 29, 1997, and held between 12 and 18 months are taxed at a maximum rate of 28 percent. (This was done to avoid penalizing taxpayers who would otherwise would have been better off under the old law.) Gains on sales of collectibles continue to be taxed at a top rate of 28 percent.

    The 20 percent rate drops to 18 percent for assets purchased on or after January 1, 2001 (or existing assets "marked-to-market") and held for five years. Similarly, the 10 percent rate drops to 8 percent for assets sold on or after that date and held for five years (without having to mark-to-market).

    There is no capital gains tax on up to $250,000 for single individuals and $500,000 for married couples on the gain from the sale of a principal residence. To qualify, taxpayers generally must own and use the residence as a principal residence for at least two of five years prior to the sale. The provision is effective for sales and exchanges after May 6, 1997.

    Any part of a gain on the sale of depreciable real property which represents prior depreciation is "recaptured" and taxed at a maximum rate of 25 percent.

  • Individual Retirement Accounts

    In general, the traditional "front-loaded" IRAs are substantially expanded, and are made more flexible through the addition of penalty-free withdrawal options. In addition, two new types of "back-loaded" IRAs are created-the Roth IRA PLUS and Education IRA.

    Specifically, current law income limits on the traditional deductible IRAs are phased-up over time. The income limits for the $2,000 IRA deduction, which currently phase out between $40,000 and $50,000 of adjusted gross income for joint returns and $25,000 and $35,000 for individuals, are increased gradually beginning in 1998 when the income phase-out range will be $50,000 and $60,000 of adjusted gross income for joint returns and $30,000 and $40,000 for individuals, until 2007, when the income phase-out range will be $80,000 and $100,000 for joint returns and $50,000 and $60,000 for individuals. In addition, starting in 1998, an individual who does not participate in an employment-based retirement plan would be eligible to make deductible IRA contributions even if that individual's spouse participates in an employment-based retirement plan. Eligibility for this special active participant relief will phase-out for adjusted gross incomes between $150,000 and $160,000 for joint returns.

    A new "back-loaded" IRA, called a Roth IRA PLUS, is created. Contributions are not deductible but the income can be withdrawn tax-free if (1) the IRA holder is at least 59 1/2, on account of death or disability of the holder, or for a first-time home purchase; and (2) the IRA has been open for at least five years after the first contribution to a Roth IRA PLUS. Contributions are phased out at income levels of $95,000 and $110,000 for singles and $150,000 and $160,000 for couples. Beginning in 1998, taxable rollovers from a tax-deductible IRA to a back-loaded Roth IRA PLUS without application of the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty are permitted for IRA account holders (both individuals and joint returns) with income of less than $100,000.

    Beginning in 1998, contributions may be made to a new Education IRA. The Eduction IRA will be a trust or custodial account established for the purpose of paying higher education expenses of the designated beneficiary. Contributions to the ED IRA will not be deductible but earnings would accrue tax free. All distributions from the ED IRA will be tax-free if used to pay higher education expenses of the designated beneficiary. Eligibility to contribute to an ED IRA is phased out for adjusted gross incomes between $150,000 and $160,000 for joint returns and $95,000 and $110,000 for individuals.

    IRA assets may be invested in certain platinum coins and in certain gold, silver, platinum, or palladium bullion, effective after December 31, 1997.

  • Alternative Minimum Tax

    The recovery periods used for purposes of the alternative minimum tax are conformed for purposes of the regular tax for property placed in service after December 31, 1998. However, AMT taxpayers must use the 150 percent declining balance method rather than the 200 percent method used by regular taxpayers.


Center Forum Assesses Impact of U.S. Tax Code on Competitiveness of Financial Service Firms

America's increasingly important financial service sector firms can face much higher tax rates on foreign source income than do their international competitors when operating in the same third country, according to a new study prepared for a June 26 forum sponsored by the ACCF Center for Policy Research on Capitol Hill.

Dr. Thomas Horst, former director of the international tax staff at the U.S. Treasury and now managing director of Horst, Frisch, Clowery & Finan, presented his analysis comparing the tax treatment of U.S.-based financial service firms with that of the eleven countries that are the home base for most major competitors of the U.S.-based firms. Dr. Horst found that, as a consequence of their more favorable tax codes, foreign financial service firms can offer products at lower prices than can U.S. firms, thereby giving them a competitive advantage in world markets.

Using Taiwan as one example, the Horst study shows that while U.S. insurance firms are taxed at a rate of 35 percent on income earned abroad, French-, Swiss-, or Belgian-owned firms face a tax rate of only 14.3 percent. To clarify, a U.S. subsidiary is taxed at an assumed rate of 14.3 percent on income earned in a country such as Taiwan, and then the U.S. parent company is taxed at an additional 20.7 percent on the foreign source investment income-whether it is repatriated or not-for a total of 35 percent. As a result, U.S. firms face tax rates that are as much as 145 percent higher than those paid by their competitors on income earned in the same third country.

Responding to Dr. Horst's paper were Dr. Gary C. Hufbauer, director of studies and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair, Council on Foreign Relations, and Dr. Scott Newlon, international economist, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Moderating the panel was Dr. Margo Thorning, senior vice president and chief economist of the ACCF Center for Policy Research.

The Honorable Orrin Hatch (R-UT), member of the Senate Finance Committee and sponsor of the "International Tax Simplification for American Competitiveness Act" (S. 843), a measure that would give active financial firms equal treatment with other multinationals and allow U.S. financial firms to increase their competitiveness abroad, opened the forum with his perspective on the U.S. tax treatment of financial service companies.

Senator Hatch noted that "since 1986, income that is earned abroad by a U.S. financial service company is taxed currently in the U.S. as foreign personal holding company income. However, this treatment and the extension of the Subpart F rules to active financial service income, while noteworthy in its attempt to prevent abuse, impedes the ability of U.S firms that are active in providing financial and insurance services to compete with the powerful German, Swiss, and British financial firms in the international financial services business."

The 1997 tax bill included a provision designed to ameliorate the disadvantage faced by U.S. financial service firms compared to their international competitors. This provision, the exemption from foreign personal holding company income under Subpart F for active financing income, was selected for line-item veto by President Clinton on August 11, 1997.

The June 26 forum is one of a series of Center-sponsored symposia on tax, regulatory, and environmental policy issues. On September 9, the Center will host its second international tax policy forum, "Free Trade vs. Protectionism and International Sanctions: What Are the Issues?" On September 24, the Center will sponsor a symposium on "Climate Change Policy, Economic Growth, and Environmental Quality."

For more information on programs sponsored by the ACCF Center for Policy Research or to obtain a monograph containing the complete edited proceedings of the Center's forum on "The Impact of the U.S. Tax Code on the Competitiveness of Financial Service Firms," please contact the Center at 1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20006-2302; telephone: 202/293-5811; fax: 202/785-8165; e-mail: info@accf.org. Single copies are available for $25.00; 10 or more copies are $20.00 each.


ACCF Center for Policy Research Director

NORMAN B. TURE

Dr. Norman B. Ture, long-time member of the board of trustees of the ACCF Center for Policy Research, died on August 10. As Undersecretary of the Treasury in the first Reagan Administration, Dr. Ture was a principal architect of the 1981 tax cuts. The author of numerous books and articles on public policy issues, particularly in the field of tax policy, he was the founder and president of IRET, the Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation, a Washington, D.C.-based public policy research institute. Noted the Wall Street Journal, "Dr. Ture was among the most economically rigorous of the supply-side theorists, articulating honestly and carefully for any who cared to see the links between the tax system and the economy's incentives to produce. His input to the ongoing debates over the fundamentals of economic policymaking will be very much missed."


Save the Date: September Forums Planned on International Trade and Climate Change Policy

September 9 · Free Trade vs. Protectionism and International Sanctions: What Are the Issues?

Gary C. Hufbauer
and Bruce Stokes of the Council on Foreign Relations will present research on the benefits of open markets and the costs of trade protection and economic sanctions. Congressman Jim Kolbe (R-AZ) will keynote. 8:30 a.m. at the Capitol Hill Club.

September 24 · Climate Change Policy, Economic Growth, and Environmental Quality

Mary H. Novak
of the WEFA Group will show how policies to restrict carbon emissions could affect lifestyles; Richard Schmalensee of MIT will discuss joint implementation and tradable permits issues. Congressman John D. Dingell (D-MI) and Senator Charles T. Hagel (R-NE) will keynote. 8:00 a.m. at the Holiday Inn on the Hill, registration fee.

Please contact the ACCF Center for Policy Research to register for these forums.

Capital Formation is published by the American Council for Capital Formation, a nonprofit, tax-exempt corporation organized under the laws of the District of Columbia. Editor-in-Chief: Charls E. Walker, Chairman and Founder. Editor: Mark A. Bloomfield, President. Associate Editors: Mari Lee Dunn, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer; Margo Thorning, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist. Capital Formation is distributed to ACCF supporters, the media, policymakers in the executive branch, and members of Congress and congressional staff. If you would like to subscribe to Capital Formation and obtain information on the activities of the ACCF, please contact Capital Formation, 1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20006-2302. Phone: 202/293-5811; fax: 202/785-8165; e-mail: info@accf.org

ACCF
ACCF, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20006 | Tel (202) 293-5811 | Fax (202) 785-8165 | info@ACCF.org